Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
FMU or Injectors?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: FMU or Injectors?

  1. #1
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54

    FMU or Injectors?

    hey everyone
    i just bought my 1000 kit in December and had it put on but i am about to up the boost. I have bought an 8" crank pulley and I am looking for a power pipe so i'm expecting around 8 to 10 pounds of boost. Right now I have 24lb injectors and a 255lph fuel pump but I am not running an FMU. I know I am pushing my luck now w/o using an FMU but I know I will either have to get an FMU or larger injectors after i increase the boost. My other mods include: Performer Intake, eql headers, off road H-Pipe, 70mm TB, and a 75mm Pro M Mass air meter. What would be my best route injectors or FMU. If injectors what size, if FMU what kind. I have an FMU that came with my kit but i think it is calibrated for 19lb injectors and i have changed mine to 24lb so i was running very rich so i took it off. Should i use this FMU. thanks for your help.

  2. #2
    Long Time SCH Member Doug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,115
    With your mods I would suggest 36 pound injectors. It may seem a little big, but if you are going to do heads in the future they will work fine.
    14-1 compression 402ci with a little nitrous

  3. #3
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54

    will that be enough

    Do you think that will be enough w/o an FMU and what fuel pressure do you think i should run w/ 36.

  4. #4
    Long Time SCH Member Doug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,115
    I've personally made over 475 rwhp with 36's and no FMU. Set the fuel pressure to stock to start with. If you know how to read a spark, then get on it, listen for detonation, and then pull a plug to rea it. If you don't know how, get it dyno-tuned.
    Doug
    14-1 compression 402ci with a little nitrous

  5. #5
    Senior SCH Member mheinjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    683
    I had the same combo you had, except I had a GT-40 intake, and I usec 36lb injectors and no FMU, and Everything worked out fine....
    Mark
    90 GT, With a Forged 383 Chevy, AFR 227 heads, BDS 6-71 Blower with 2 750 edelbrock carbs, all braided lines, TH-400 reverse manual valve body to back it up, and so much more.....
    Want to see?????

    Old Times with 302...
    T-5: 12.671@110.52mph(1.951 60ft.)
    Tremec TKO: 12.275@110.89(1.758 60ft)


    Avatar Collection:


  6. #6
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54
    thanks for your help i guess i am going to get the 36s then. I just put the 24s and a new Pro M in this past summer. I wish i new then what i know now but at the time i was not planning on buying a blower. Well if any one know someone who wants some 24lb w/ about 2000 miles on them i will be selling mine in about a month.

  7. #7
    Senior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    167
    I would get 42# injectors now. Eventually you will buy heads for the car and will make more power and will need to upgrade the 36's. Get the 42's now, recalibrate the MAF, and get a good tune. You won't have to worry about injectors for a while.

  8. #8
    Senior SCH Member mheinjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    683
    I saw a injector chart and believe it or not 36lb injectors could hold up to some good hp. I think 36's are fine if you are only going to like 550! I mean if your doing some serious racing, and stuff than go to 42's, but do what you want... Maybe you should get 42's why not... They might actually be cheaper! I know I paid a sh*t load for my 36's
    Mark
    90 GT, With a Forged 383 Chevy, AFR 227 heads, BDS 6-71 Blower with 2 750 edelbrock carbs, all braided lines, TH-400 reverse manual valve body to back it up, and so much more.....
    Want to see?????

    Old Times with 302...
    T-5: 12.671@110.52mph(1.951 60ft.)
    Tremec TKO: 12.275@110.89(1.758 60ft)


    Avatar Collection:


  9. #9
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54
    thanks for the info mheinjr i think i will go w/ the 42s and a tune b/c i want to do a 347 motor in the next couple years.

  10. #10
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Jax, Fl
    Posts
    96
    hey silver, I blew a h/g with your set up. i'm upgrading to 42's and loosing the fmu. also picked up some tw heads. definitely getting a good dyno tune this time.
    s/c 331

  11. #11
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54
    slow91 do you think you blew the h/g because of the injector size or b/c you had a cam and 8" pulley?

  12. #12
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Jax, Fl
    Posts
    96
    well I was really pushing the limits of the 24's using the 8" pulley and the other mods. I was hitting 9lbs of boost. car also had no tune or custom chip.
    s/c 331

  13. #13
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NC Gastonia
    Posts
    54
    yea i would say you went over the limit of those 24s. lol. I have the 8" crank but its not on the car so since i am not running an FMU I am going to wait until i get some more injectors to put it on. I am going to put 42lb injectors, power pipe, 8" pulley, and 1.6 r/r all on at the same time and have it tuned w/ a custom chip. how much power do you think all of that will give me?

  14. #14
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Jax, Fl
    Posts
    96
    I would guess about 350 or so. maybe more with a good tune.
    s/c 331

  15. #15
    SCH Moderator regattacoupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Bucyrus oh
    Posts
    2,845
    The 8" crank owns! MY car was 100% meaner when i did the swap. 6mph speaks for the HP and the torque down low was a huge improvement. My car was really rich with stock pullies and the C&L i was running so i thought, Hmmm, Add boost or cut fuel?

    No Brainer! just don't skimp on the fuel!
    89 Coupe with parts stacked inside of it and about 30#'s of dust on it with no end in sight. :weird:





    Although I am collecting parts for a 12.5:1 393 :D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •