Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Blow Through vs Draw through
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Blow Through vs Draw through

  1. #1
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    21

    Blow Through vs Draw through

    Guys, what is the main advantage to having the MAF as a blow through setup vs on the intake side on the blower like vortechs? IM sure it deals withthe intercooler, but I would like to hear what others have to say

  2. #2
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    18
    well with the i/c i'm told you have to run a blow through.. I don't run an intercooler and i originally had mine set up so a pro m 77mm was in the drivers side fender.. then i plumbed the bypass air back in just before the blower.. with the draw through you can not let any bypass air escape into the atmosphere.. well the problem i had was the bypass air was back traking into the meter and screwing up my voltage readings under vacumn when i went abouve 10-11 lb pulley. I've come to the conclusion that the best way to run the ATI's is to use a Univer blow through.. They are absolutely awesome IMO.
    95 GT MOVIE HERE
    __________________________________________________
    92 GT, BBK CAI, Mac Headers, Off road H pipe, 2 Chamber Flows, Underdrive pulleys,
    High Performance AOD, Edge Converter,tubing, etc, etc

  3. #3
    Senior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    156
    I also tried the draw thru approach with absolutely no luck! I am running the 2 core and my car would barely run. I have since switched back to the trusty Pro M bullet.
    1995 GT
    Black on Black
    T-5
    D.S.S Pro Bullet 306
    and almost every part in the FRPP catalog.

    And a 'Strange' whistling sound under the hood courtesy of ProCharger......

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •