Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Paxton SN2000 question
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Paxton SN2000 question

  1. #1
    Junior SCH Member oray777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    38

    Paxton SN2000 question

    Does anyone have this supercharger and can they tell me the Carb E.O. number on it? How well does this supercharger work?

  2. #2
    Senior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    482
    A blast on stock or mildly modified 5.0s, it's intended application.

    F=MA

  3. #3
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    76
    I agree with F=MA. I just installed mine. What are you planning to put it in?

    Mike

  4. #4
    Junior SCH Member oray777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    38
    It's going on a 1991 Ford Mustang LX 5.0. I'm looking at the SN2000 or SN93. Do you guys know what the max boost is on the SN93 model? The SN93 is for 1500.00 and the SN2000 is 1900.00. What you guys think?

  5. #5
    Senior SCH Member pavement pounde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    715
    Both are the same in performance but I am not quite sure, I thought that the 2000 came with the upgraded impeller ?
    Greets, Marco
    '91 Chevy 496SS, Edelbrock Pro-flo 2 injection, alu. GMPP heads, blowercam, coolmist water injection, turbo in the works.
    *VIDEO* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZOdXg0TOdw

  6. #6
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    76
    Go with the sn 93. The extra $500 could go towards a power pipe($250), bigger injectors($289), tuner/chip($560). For $700 you can put your name on a list with cundnracing.com for a vr4 upgrade. That extra $200 out of pocket would give you a possible 12 pounds of boost vs about 6 pounds. The chip should be a priority since a good tune=free horsepower. Hope this helps.

    Mike

  7. #7
    Senior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    482
    The changes between SN2000 and 93 are in the drive unit, not the impeller side. Nothing wrong with either.

    F=MA

  8. #8
    Senior SCH Member pavement pounde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    715
    Ok, good to here.
    Greets, Marco
    '91 Chevy 496SS, Edelbrock Pro-flo 2 injection, alu. GMPP heads, blowercam, coolmist water injection, turbo in the works.
    *VIDEO* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZOdXg0TOdw

  9. #9
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    76

    sn2000: california emission #

    The only number I could find on the sn2000 was " california air resources board exemption order #d-195-14" paper sticker. I don't know what the sn93 is since I bought that used.

    Mike

  10. #10
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    63

    C.A.R.B. E.O. #

    I just purchased the SN-2000 from Cliff at CUNDN Racing and he just sent me
    the new decal for the top where the old tags were riveted onto the housing and it reads=

    C.A.R.B. E.O.
    D 195

    I received my supercharger on 6/03/09 mine has the High output impellor,

    Hope this helped you out, Todd 89LX

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •