Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Bennett Dart 331 / F1R Dyno numbers
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Bennett Dart 331 / F1R Dyno numbers

  1. #1
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21

    Bennett Dart 331 / F1R Dyno numbers

    Getting closer to the chassis dyno. Just for fun, post up your estimates...... (RWHP/RWTQ) (Pump & Race fuel)

    Specs:

    Engine: Bennett/Dart Eagle 331, Cola crank, Eagle H-beams, Ross XL400's @ 8:1, Bennett TFS HP's 325/252 flow, Bennett/Comp solid roller .724 lift - 268/275 @ .050 - 114 LS

    Air/Fuel: Wilson ported Victor Jr (converted to EFI), Wilson spacer/elbow/rails/90mm TB, 83# Deka's, Aeromotive Eliminator -12 feed/-10 to rails, Kooks 1 7/8 x 3.5

    Power Adder: Cog F1R @ 20#, Sheetmetal A2A, 3.5 tubing

    Trans: Dave's Racing 1.76 Glide, 8" PTC 4,800-5,200

    Electronics: MSD dist, 7AL-2, MSD ProPower HVC coil, FAST B2B
    Last edited by rtigert; 03-04-2006 at 06:10 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    126
    757/742

    Good Luck
    Eric
    89GT 392 Novi 2000 650/620 Tunned by DynotuneMP :D
    03 10th Anniversary Cobra Vert. 443/451 12.6@113

  3. #3
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    va
    Posts
    25
    826/792
    1990 Mustang LX Notchback Coupe Street Car
    DART 347 F1-R TFS-R HEADS PA SUPER COMP C4
    BIG STUFF 3 DIGITAL 7
    750 RWHP 9.23@151MPH

  4. #4
    SCH Moderator BLOWNBY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,380
    Way too much....:violent:
    351 "stockshort block": -Vortech T-trim (21 psi), Trick Flow Heads, Lunati Cam, Weldon fuel system, Lentech AOD., 3.55 gears, 27" Hoosier QTP's, 3500# with me

    -545 rwhp
    -10.02 @ 135mph---Is 9.99 to much to ask?:freaks:
    -1.42-- 60'
    Quote Originally Posted by regattacoupe
    Since when do they let Homo's with 700rwhp that run 11's be a SCH mod? :shocked: :obscene: :D

  5. #5
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21
    I replaced the Aeromotive Eliminator and replaced it with a Weldon 2035 and controller

  6. #6
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21
    BTT

  7. #7
    Junior SCH Member Racer LX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    41
    Make any pulls yet? I'd guess around 750 RWHP. Won't guess on the torque, it can measure crazy with an automatic.
    1988 Mustang LX Vortech Supercharged
    546 RWHP/525 RWTQ
    Yippie-kiyah Muthafuka! - Bruce Willis, Die Hard

  8. #8
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21
    Finishing the last of the 3.5" intercooler plumbing right now. Will be off to Jet-Hot on Monday, then dyno after the tubing returns

  9. #9
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21
    3.5 tubing is back from Jet-Hot!! Should be tuned shortly...


  10. #10
    Junior SCH Member 1 Dwn Cam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Glendora, Ca
    Posts
    18
    That Piping looks awsome! My question is there any pro's/cons of going to a piping larger than 3"? Reason I ask is because I'm in the process of installing a Procharged 406 SBC W/D1-SC and I would like to go to custom 3.5" or 4" plumbing. The motor made 780hp @ the crank with the OEM 3" crap ATI sent me. Just wondering if it would be good/bad to step up to the larger piping?
    Super Chevy Feature- August 2001

    Camaro Performers Feature- Winter 2001

    Super Chevy Tech Article- November 2005

    Super Chevy Tech Article- December 2005

    This will give you an Idea!

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2368130/1

  11. #11
    Junior SCH Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    21
    The are a few reasons that I went with 3.5" over the 3". My intercooler is 3.5" and my throttle body is 3.5 (90mm). If I'd have used the standard 3" sized tubing, I might as well have simply used a 75mm TB and a 3" IC. My thoughts are that it would be like running -10 to your filter - then -8 to your rails - then back to -10 fuel rail.... not exactly the same but, same theory. So to answer your question, I don't feel that a 4" would have gotten me any improvement over the 3.5 since 4" is bigger than the rest of my components and 3" would have been a bottle neck in my system. That is just my opinion.

    ATI rates the 3" Universal Tubing Kit at 350Hp less than the 3.5" Universal Kit (950-vs-1350, respectively)

  12. #12
    if it doesnt make 850 to the tire your doing something wrong...i also think you should get rid of those 83' ang get some 160's now and save yourself the aggrivation...
    dale@swillracing

  13. #13
    SCH Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    83
    so what kind of power did it make?
    93 notch-s-trim@11 p.s.i.,twisted wedge,GT-40,comp,306-pump gas only-10.93@129.7 on bfg drag radials--10.64@127.5 on ET drags
    548rwhp/502 rwtq

    new 340" procharged combo in the works

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •